When Perimeter Giants Fall in the Same Week: Zscaler, Cloudflare, Palo Alto Networks
- Mirai Systems

- Sep 6
- 3 min read
"If Zscaler and Palo Alto Networks with their deep security benches and world-class expertise can fall prey to a supply-chain token compromise, what does that tell us?" Parthasarathi Chakraborty- Security Executive | Deputy CISO | Adjunct Professor @ Northwestern

Three breaches. Three perimeter giants. All in the past week.
Zscaler confirmed a breach exposing customer data after attackers compromised Salesloft and Drift integrations.
Cloudflare disclosed unauthorized access via stolen credentials.
Palo Alto Networks revealed support case data exposure tied to unauthorized access.
Different entry points. Same lesson: perimeter walls alone no longer hold.
The Cracks in the Wall
These companies define the perimeter security market. Yet even they fell victim within days of each other. If the builders of the wall can be breached, what does that say about those standing behind it?
Perimeter tools—firewalls, secure web gateways, access brokers—aren’t obsolete. But they are insufficient on their own. Traditional perimeter-focused architectures can’t contain adversaries once they’re inside.
And this is not isolated. Large organizations like Cisco, AT&T, MGM, and Orange have also been breached. Different industries. Different attack paths. Same reality: no perimeter stands unbroken forever.
Why This Week Matters
Attackers don’t need to blast through the front door. Supply chain integrations, stolen tokens, and overlooked access paths open quieter routes in. And those paths are multiplying as organizations rely on dozens of vendors to run daily operations.
The breach itself is only the entry point. The real danger comes next: lateral movement, escalation of privileges, and silent dwell time in the ABBI Phase™ (After Breach, Before Impact). That hidden window is where attackers quietly build leverage, stage data theft, and prepare to trigger impact at scale.
Expanded Attack Surface
Each integration adds new APIs, credentials, data flows, and trust relationships. Every one of them is a potential entry point.

Shared Risk
If a vendor has weak identity controls, unpatched systems, or sloppy data practices, those flaws become yours. Attackers often move laterally from a compromised vendor into the customer environment.
Industry Guidance
Frameworks like NIST, CISA, and ISO stress third-party risk management for a reason. Vendor relationships remain one of the top compromise vectors.
By connecting with a third party, you’re not just gaining their services—you’re inheriting their vulnerabilities unless that risk is actively monitored and contained.
The Holistic Shift
The breaches at Zscaler, Cloudflare, and Palo Alto Networks highlight the need for a more complete playbook:
Prevention at the edge is necessary but incomplete
Containment must activate the second an attacker steps inside
Resilience ensures operations continue even in crisis
CISA has been blunt: “Microsegmentation works by protecting a smaller group of resources, thereby reducing the attack surface, limiting lateral movement, and increasing visibility.” That is containment in practice.
For a deeper look at how containment fits into the ABBI Phase™ and unGUARDED SPACE™, see our Post-Breach Threat Containment and Cloaking and Virtual Chambering web pages.
CISA has been blunt: “Microsegmentation works by protecting a smaller group of resources, thereby reducing the attack surface, limiting lateral movement, and increasing visibility.” That is containment in practice.
Three breaches in one week should be more than a headline. It’s a wake-up call. Perimeter alone won’t save us. The future of cybersecurity lies in proactive prevention, real-time containment, and uninterrupted resilience.




Comments